NATIONAL
REGISTERED A GENTS, INC.
SERVICE
OF
PROCESS SUMMARY TRANSMITTAL FORM
|
To: DAN L.
GUNTER
|
SOP Transmittal #
F
L74394
|
640 SOUTH
MAIN STREET (800)
767-1553 - Telephone
LABELLE,
FL
33935-
(609) 716-0820 - Fax
Entity
Served: ALICO, INC.
Enclosed
herewith are legal documents received on behalf of the above captioned entity by
National Registered Agents, Inc. or its Affiliate in the State of FLORIDAon
this 27 day of October.
2008 . The following is a
summary of the document(s)
received:
|
1.
|
Title
of
Action:
BAXTER G TROUTMAN VS
JOHN R ALEXANDER, JOHN D ALEXANDER & ALICO INC,
ET AL
|
2. Document(s)
served:
X Summons Subpoena Injunction
X
Complaint Third
Party
Complaint
Notice of
Petition
X Demand for Jury
Trial
Mechanics Lien
Garnishment Default
Judgment Other:
|
3.
|
Court
of Jurisdiction/ 10TH
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR POLK CTY
FL
|
|
|
Case &
Docket Number:
08CA10178
|
|
4.
|
Amount
Claimed, if
any:
|
|
5.
|
Method of Service
(select
one):
|
X Personally served
by: X Process Server Deputy
Sheriff U.
S Marshall
Delivered
Via: Certified
Mail
Regular
Mail Facsimile
(Envelope
enclosed) (Envelope
enclosed)
Other
(Explain):
|
6.
|
Date
and Time of
Receipt: 10/27/2008 11:18:11
AM EST (GMT -5)
|
|
7.
|
Appearance/Answer Date:
20
Days
|
|
8. Received
From:
(Name. Address & Telephone
Number)
FROST VAN
DEN
BOOM
& SMITH
PO BOX 2188
BARTOW, FL 33831
8635330314
11. Special
Comments:
|
9. Federal
Express
Airbill #
798048093309
10. Call Made to:
VM - DAN L.
GUNTER
|
NATIONAL REGISTERED AGENTS,
INC.
Copies
To:
Transmitted by: Andrea
Doyle
The information
contained in
this Summary Transmittal Form is provided by
National Registered Agents, Inc.
for informational purposes only
and should not he considered a legal opinion. It is the responsibility of
the parties receiving this form to review the legal documents forwarded and to
take appropriate action.
IN
THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN
AND FOR POLK COUNTY FLORIDA
BAXTER G.
TROUTMAN, derivatively as
Shareholder
of and on behalf of
Alico,
Inc., a Florida profit corporation,
|
Plaintiff,
V.
JOHN
R. ALEXANDER, individually;
JOHN
D. ALEXANDER, individually;
Defendants,
|
Case No.
08CA10178
Division:
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
ALICO,
INC.,
|
Nominal
Defendant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMONS
|
THE STATE
OF FLORIDA:
To Each
Sheriff of the State:
YOU ARE COMMANDED to
serve this summons and a copy of the complaint or petition in this action on
defendant: ALICO,
INC. by serving its Registered Agent,
NRAI SERVICES, INC., 2731 EXECUTIVE PARK DRIVE, SUITE 4, WESTON,
FL 33331.
Each
defendant is required to serve written defenses to the complaint or petition on
JOHN
W. FROST, II, Esq., Plaintiffs attorney, whose address is FROST
VAN
DEN BOOM & SMITH,
P.A., P.O. Box 2188, Bartow, FL 33831 (395 South Central Avenue, Bartow,
FL 33830) (telephone: 863-533-0314), within 20 days after service of this
summons on that Defendant, exclusive of the day of service, and to file the
original of the defenses with the clerk of this court either before service on
Plaintiffs attorney or immediately thereafter. If the Defendant fails to do so,
a default will be entered against that Defendant for the relief demanded in the
complaint or petition.
| DATED
on this |
22 |
day
of October, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RICHARD
M. WEISS
As
Clerk of Said Court
By
/s/ Mary Murphy
As
Deputy
Clerk
|
|
|
(COURT
SEAL)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you
are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to
participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no
cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the
Office of the Court Administrator, (863) 534-4690, within two (2) working days
of your receipt of this Summons; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call
(TDD) (863) 534-7777 or Florida Relay Service 711.
IMPORTANTE
Usted ha
sido demandado legalmente. Tiene veinte (20) dias, contados a partir del recibo
de esta notificacion, para contestar la demanda adjunta, por escrito, y
presentaria ante este tribunal. Una Ilamada telefonica no lo protegera; si usted
desea que el tribunal considere su defensa, debe presentar su respuesta por
escrito, incluyendo el numero del caso y los nombres de las partes interesadas
en dicho caso. Si usted no contesta la demanda a tiempo, pudiese perder el caso
y podria ser despojado de sus ingresos y propiedades, o privado de sus derechos,
sin previo aviso del tribunal. Existen otros requisitos legates. Si lo desea,
puede usted consultar a un abogado immediatamente. Si no conoce a un abogado,
puede Hamar a una de las oficinas de asistencia legal que aparecen en la guia
telefonica.
Si desea
responder a la demanda por su cuenta, al mismo tiempo en que presenta su
respuesta ante el tribunal, debera usted enviar par correo o entregar una copia
de su respuesta a la persona denominada abajo como "Plaintiff/Plaintiffs
Attorney". (Demandate o Abogado del Demanadante.)
IMPORTANTE
Des
poursuites judiciaries ont ete entreprises contre vous. Vous avez 20 jours
consecutifs a partir de la date de ('assignation de cette citation pour deposer
une reponse ecrite a la plainte ci-jointe aupres de ce Tribunal. Un simple coup
de telephone est insuffisant pourvous proteger; vous etes oblige de deposer
votre reponse ecrite, avec mention du numero de dossier ci-dessus et du nom des
parties nommees ici, si vous souhaitez que le Tribunal entende votre cause. Si
vous ne deposez pas votre reponse ecrite dans le relai requis, vous risquez de
perdre la cause ainsi que votre salaire, votre argent, et vas biens peuvent etre
saisis par la suite, sans aucun preavis ulterieur du Tribunal. II y a d'autres
obligations juridiques et vous pouvez requerir les services immediats d'un
avocet. Si vous ne connaissez pas d'avocat, vous pourdez telephoner a un service
de reference d'avocats ou a un bureau d'assistance juridique (figurant a
l'annuaire de telephones).
Si vous
choisissez de deposer vous-meme une reponse ecrite, it vous faudra egalement, en
meme temps que cette formalite, faire parvenir ou expedier une copie au carbone
ou une photocopie de votre reponse ecrite au "Plaintiff/Plaintiffs Attorney"
(Plaignant ou a son avocet) nomme ci-dessous.
IN
THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN
AND FOR POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA
BAXTER G.
TROUTMAN, derivatively
as
Shareholder of and on behalf of
Alico,
Inc., a Florida profit corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN R.
ALEXANDER, individually;
JOHN D.
ALEXANDER, individually;
Defendants,
and
ALICO,
INC.,
Nominal
Defendant.
VERIFIED
COMPLAINT
AND DEMAND FOR JURY
TRIAL
Plaintiff,
BAXTER G. TROUTMAN,
derivatively as a Shareholder of and on behalf of Alico, Inc., a Florida
profit corporation, by and through the undersigned attorneys, sues Defendants,
JOHN R. ALEXANDER, individually, and JOHN D. ALEXANDER, individually, and sues
Nominal Defendant, ALICO, INC., and in support thereof alleges:
GENERAL
ALLEGATIONS
1. This
is a Shareholder derivative action pursuant to Fla. Stat.
607.07401 to recover damages for Alico, Inc., a Florida profit
corporation (hereinafter "ALICO") in excess of $1 million.
2. Alico is
a land management company with its principal place of business in LaBelle,
Florida.
3. Defendants,
J. D. Alexander and J. R. Alexander are residents of Polk County,
Florida.
4. Plaintiff,
BAXTER G. TROUTMAN, derivatively as a Shareholder of and on behalf of Alico,
Inc., (hereinafter "Plaintiff Troutman") is and was at all times material to the
actions complained of herein a Shareholder in Alico.
5. Plaintiff
Troutman did not make a demand on each of the Directors of Alico to institute on
behalf of Alico the claims asserted herein because such demand would obviously
be unavailing and futile.
6. A demand
would be futile because it would be asking J.
D. Alexander to bring suit against himself. The same would be true for
John R. Alexander. Also, J. D. Alexander controls this Board. Director
Mutz has resigned so no majority can be reached to sue J. D. Alexander and J. R.
Alexander. Furthermore, Robert J. Viguet, Jr. is his roommate from college
and Robert E. Lee Caswell is his brother-in-law and J. R. Alexander's
son-in-law.
7. J. D. Alexander at all times material
hereto was a
Director on the Board of Alico. J. D.
Alexander is also the President and C.E.O. and on the Board of Directors of the Atlantic Blue
Trust, Inc. (now known as Atlanticblue Group, Inc. www.atlanticblue.com).
8. J. R.
Alexander at all times material hereto was a Director and Chairman of the Board
of Alico as well as the President and C.E.O. of Atlantic Blue Trust,
Inc.
9. Defendants,
J. D. Alexander and John R. Alexander (hereinafter cumulatively "the
Alexanders") wrongfully requested that Alico consider a restructuring, including
the possibility of a merger with a company called Atlantic Blue Trust, Inc., and
the payment of a special dividend to the Alexanders.
10. Atlanticblue
Group, Inc. is headquartered in Lake Wales, Florida, and is a real estate
management acquisition and development company that forms core business lines
and a demonstrated understanding of responsible land management to properties in
Central and South Central Florida.
11. Atlantic
Blue Trust, Inc. at that time carried a significant amount of debt incurred in
the buyout of Harriett Harris.
12. The
Alexanders knowing about the Atlantic Blue Trust, Inc. debt asked Alico in bad
faith to consider the restructuring and the payment of a special dividend to
advance their own interests and to the detriment of non Atlantic Blue Trust,
Inc. Stockholders of Alico.
13. The
Alexanders insisted early in the process on the payment of a special dividend by
Alico structured in a manner that would have the effect of further increasing
their own shareholdings in Alico.
14. The
following events among others reflected a disregard by the Alexanders for the
principles of good corporate governance and independent professional management
of Alico:
A. The
Alexanders' self-serving efforts to circumvent the Alico Board's nominating
committee procedures to nominate an Atlantic Blue Trust, Inc. Director to fill
the vacancy on the Board created by the retirement of W. Bernard
Lester;
B. The
insistence by the Alexanders that John R. and John D. constitute a substantial
part of the senior management team at Alico following the consummation of the
payment of a special dividend; and
C. The
Alexanders repeated insistence on the payment of a special dividend and that J.
R. Alexander would serve for a period of two (2) or more years as "interim"
Chief Executive Officer following the retirement of W. Bernard Lester,
notwithstanding the Alico Board's repeated declarations of objection to such an
arrangement.
15. In an effort to safeguard against the above-referenced concerns
forced by the then Alico Independent Directors, the Independent Directors
proposed that the Board and ABT, as applicable, adopt the following agreements
and procedures:
A. A
standstill. During the period ending the first business day
following Alico's annual meeting the shareholders (the "Term") none of ABT, its
shareholders and their respective affiliates would acquire beneficial ownership
of (except pursuant to the pending restructuring proposal), or become part of a
"group" with respect to "any shares of Alico's capital stock other than those
reflected on ABT's December 16, 2004 Schedule 13D.
B. The Board's composition;
support for the Board. During the Term, none of ABT, its
shareholders and their respective affiliates would take any action to change the
composition or size of the Board or the terms of the nominating committee
charter or, except through ABT's representatives on the Board, take any action
to affect the policies or management of Alico, or solicit or participate in
solicitation of proxies except in accordance with the recommendation of the
Board.
C. Senior
Management. The Board would promptly
engage in an executive
search firm for the purpose of undertaking an expedited
search for, and
recommendations as to, a CEO and certain other executive officers of Alico. The
Independent Board proposed that candidates could
include
affiliates of ABT. Through
in-depth screening and interviewing of all
candidates presented pursuant to this process, the Independent Board
would identify the best qualified persons and make all
efforts to hire them on appropriate and customary terms.
D. Counsel and
advisors. In the event, the special committee
of
Independent Directors were to be dissolved, the Independent Directors
would still be authorized to retain and compensate any legal, financial or other
advisors the Independent Directors deemed necessary
or appropriate to assist them in the exercise of their duties as
Directors of the Board.
E.
Procedural
matters. Alico would adopt customary advanced notice
By-Laws for Director nominations and shareholder proposals and provisions
allowing the Independent Board to require the establishment of a record date in
connection with any written consent in lieu of a shareholder's
meeting.
16. Notwithstanding
extensive discussions at the Alico Board meetings the Independent Directors were
unable at that meeting to obtain the Alexanders' agreement to the
above-referenced terms.
17. As a
matter of fact, the Alexanders tried to push through their ill advised proposal
without concern to the wellbeing of Alico and its Shareholders. As a result, The
Alexanders as Directors consciously ignored their duties to Alico.
18.
Subsequently, the Independent Directors were informed by the Alexanders that
upon further consideration, the Alexanders would not agree to any limitations on
theirs and ABT's ability to remove and replace
directors of the Board at any time
and they required ABT be permitted to acquire additional shares of
Alico's common stock up to approximately 49.6% of the outstanding common
shares.
19. This
unyielding position by the Alexanders on the ability to remove or replace
Directors and the Alexanders' desire to increase ABT's ownership of is a clear
case of the Alexanders exercising undue influence. Furthermore, if the
Alexanders got their way, they would be able to exercise even more undue
influence on the Independent Directors and Alico.
20. Furthermore,
the Independent Directors did not believe the Alexanders and felt that the
Alexanders' position called into question the longer viability of the other
terms that the Alexanders had expressed their willingness to accept at that
time.
21. As
Directors of Alico, the Alexanders, negligently, carelessly, and intentionally
failed to perform their duties so that funds and assets of the Nominal Defendant
corporation Alico were wasted. By these aforementioned actions, Plaintiff
Troutman and other similarly situated Shareholders, and the Nominal Defendant
corporation Alico suffered great loss.
22. Based
upon the foregoing and against the background of the Independent Board members'
great concern that Alico was asked to consider by the Alexanders' payment of a
special dividend which would disproportionately benefit the Alexanders and the
ABT shareholders, the Alexanders' actions including those described above and
their unwillingness to accept the crucial terms of the Independent Board
members' proposal, caused the mass resignation of the Independent Directors of
Alico.
23. Even
after this mass resignation, the Alexanders continued to act in bad faith
against Alico's best interest and continued to push forward their self-serving
agenda. Their actions are so egregious that they can not have been the product
of any sound business judgment.
24. As a
direct and proximate result of this, Alico suffered over $1 million worth of
damages.
25. Pursuant
to Fla. Stat.
607.07401 the prevailing party in the instant
case maybe
awarded reasonable expenses for maintaining the proceeding,
including reasonable attorney's fees.
26. Any
denial by the Alico Board at this time to file a lawsuit against Senator J. D.
Alexander and J. R. Alexander would be wrongful.
27.
Plaintiff Troutman requests a trial by jury on all issues so triable.
WHEREFORE,
Plaintiff, BAXTER G. TROUTMAN, derivatively as a Shareholder of and on behalf of
Alico, Inc., a Florida profit corporation, requests:
1. That this
Court use its discretion and grant a jury trial.
2. A
determination of the losses sustained by the Defendant corporation
Alico by reason of the wrongful acts and negligence of the Defendants,
J. D. Alexander and J. R. Alexander.
3. That
Defendants, J. D. Alexander and J. R. Alexander, be directed to pay to Defendant
Alico the sums so found to be due and that judgment be entered against
Defendants, J. D. Alexander and J. R. Alexander, in the amount found to be due
in favor of Defendant corporation Alico.
4. Plaintiff,
BAXTER G. TROUTMAN, derivatively as a Shareholder of and on behalf of Alico,
Inc., a Florida profit corporation, be awarded reasonable expenses for
maintaining this action, including reasonable attorney's fees and
costs.
5. Plaintiff,
BAXTER G. TROUTMAN, derivatively as a Shareholder of and on behalf of Alico,
Inc., a Florida profit corporation, be granted such other and further relief as
may be just.
|
FROST
VAN DEN BOOM
& SMITH, P.A.
|
John W. Frost
Florida
Bar No. 114877
Peter W. van den Boom
Florida Bar No. 143601
P.O. Box 2188
Bartow, FL 33831-2188
Telephone:863-533-0314
Facsimile:863-533-8985
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
VERIFICATION TO
COMPLAINT
STATE OF
FLORIDA
)
COUNTY OF
POLK
)
BEFORE
ME, the undersigned authority personally appeared BAXTER G. TROUTMAN, to me
known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing Verified
Complaint, and who acknowledge the allegations and statements contained therein
are true and of his knowledge and belief.
/s/ Baxter
G. Troutman
BAXTER G. TROUTMAN
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this 22 day of October,
2008, by BAXTER G. TROUTMAN, who is personally known
to me or who produced
as identification and who was
sworn under oath.
/s/
Stacey Sellers
Notary Public -
State of Florida
|
Notary Pudic Slate of Florida
Stacey Sellers
My Commission DD651388
Expires
04/13/2011
|